Best Buy Layoffs and A Sign Of The Future?

Best Buy Lays off 400+ people, closes stores.

I know, I’ve been of the opinion Best Buy is in trouble.  I’ve agreed with those various analysts on the issues.  So on the surface, the fact I’m not surprised by this is, well, not surprising.  I figured it was coming.  In fact, I figure more will come.

But what is interesting is how Best Buy seems to be putting more focus on Best Buy Mobile, smaller, “Kioskesque” stores.  A focus on smaller stores, more on mobile and related gadgets?  There’s a lot to that . . .

  • First of all, this seems like a viable strategy.  Focused, organized, standardized stores that are small and cheaper to run make sense.
  • Secondly, these stores could be easily resupplied from a central location (suggesting to me that, much like the Safeway delivery service, stores could serve as warehouses).  This could mean big stores being repurposes may be a logical focus (and may limit layoffs).
  • Third, these smaller stories could get more easily set up or torn down as needed.  Limited risk, faster adaption, and faster to take on rivals.  These stores could even be piloted easy.
  • Fourth, and this may seem out there, but in an age where you have vending machines with iPods and DSes in them, I could see experiments with a Best Buy vending system.  If we’ve got automated convenience stores, Redbox, and iPod dispensers, this isn’t too outrageous.  Oh, and it’s 24/7 . . .

Steven Savage

Pottermore: Harry Potter Ebooks Out!

The long-promised eBooks (and more) are available at the site!

So of course, you can bet we’re going to watch this one – because there’s not much out there like “Pottermore”, so it’s kind of a giant lab experiment.

Thoughts:

  • I think there will be attempts to do more “Pottermores” no matter what the success of the site – the model is interesting enough and amorphous enough for people to give it a go.  If it works is a bit of a question.
  • Meanwhile GigaOm chimes in with a great article on what publishers can learn from Pottermore, and points out DRM *is not your friend*.
  • Building on that issue, one of the flamingly, neon-bright obvious things from Pottermore is that people respond to a good property, a place to gather, and response.  The entire “walled garden” model of publishing is missing the fact you have an economy/culture building on connectivity.
  • The Pottermore site may seem complex, but consider how fast sites can be put together these days – so it may be easy to create “lesser Pottermores.”
  • I could see people building web/media careers on creating “Pottermore” like sites.  Of course, if someone founded a business to easily make these central sites for indie media properties . . .
  • Pottermore represents a multimedia exploration that is only just starting.  What if a site with books tied into an MMO?  Films?  DLC?

Steven Savage

 

How Cable Companies Can Adapt . . . Maybe

So I killed my cable.  Dead.  Gone.  No more.  Hulu, Netflix, and gizmos for me, thanks very much, that’s how I’ll get my video.

So now, based on my experience that cable is unnecessary (and financially unsound) for most households, what can cable companies do to become something more modern and useful?  What does it mean for us?

(This, by the way, assumes said companies will embrace change.  Cable companies have ,at times, followed in the steps of others, but I can’t say they’ve actually been enthused or active dealing with change.  But one can hope.)

Read more