Thoughts on Dictation

You've been reading my last week of posts. Does anything seem different? Does my writer's voice seem different? I'm not sure, so I'm asking, but the reason I ask these questions is because I've engaged in little experiment it's been very revealing.

I've been using Dragon Dictate from Nuance. Its dictation software (obviously), and I've been hearing very good things about it. Since I write a lot, of course I figured I should try some dictation software to see if it improves my writing, and my writing speed.

I am incredibly impressed.

Read more

Frustration Friday: Hiring and Unemployment

As you may have heard, apparently some people trying to hire folks for open positions have decided that having a job is one of the major qualifications for getting a job with them. Yes, this is a case where the best qualification for coming to their company is apparently that you're currently employed and willing to leave. People that are out of work are apparently out of luck as well, leading to a strange Catch-22, and evidence that some HR departments don't know what the hell they're doing.

I've tried wracking my brains as to why any sane, rational human being would use this as a standard for hiring, and as far as I can tell it's like the Microsoft rule. You don't get fired for recommending Microsoft is a solution, and if someone you hire turns out to be a bad choice, then you don't have people judging you that you hired someone unemployable because you can say "hey, they had a job at the time!"

However, as you may guess I think this is incredibly stupid. So stupid that it rates both the Frustration Friday and a series of bullet points! So get ready for formatted anger.

So, why do I think this is incredibly stupid? Let me count the ways (and bullet point them, of course).

  • First of all, there's the disloyalty factor. Do you actually want to always hire someone willing to skip out on their current job? Have you investigated their background and see if they're prone to skipping jobs anyway?
  • Second, there is the question of competency. Have you ever thought of the fact that maybe they want to leave for good reasons, like the really really screwed up their current position?
  • Third, there is what I like to call "the you're an ass" factor.  Congratulations, nameless HR person, you've just made you and your company look like a bunch of insensitive clods. By deciding that you only wanted to hire people currently have jobs you have guaranteed you've pissed off anyone who's unemployed, and if you do hire them, they are going to trust you much less–with good reason. Nice job, nameless HR person.
  • Fourth, you have just opened your company to potential claimant discrimination suits! Nice job as well, say hello to the EEOC.
  • Fifth, you are in an unethical jerk.  You may just think you're doing your job, but really, do you buy that excuse?

So, yes, I think making current employment and a factor in hiring somebody a stupid idea on many levels.

I'd like to end this frustration Friday with some useful suggestions or wisdom. So let me reach out to all those HR people the decided employment should be a factor in hiring people.

Don't do it.

Steven Savage

Frustration Friday: Museum of Bad ideas

I want a museum of bad ideas.

I want a museum (online or off) that is truly dedicated to the "it seemed like a good idea at the time" crowd of innovations, technologies, and so forth.  I don't just want snarky articles and annual "worst ofs," I want a shrine in concrete or pixels to the truly egregious ideas that people really thought were the next big thing.  I also want it as soon as possible.

I want this, because I both want to look back, and because I want a place to remind me of stupid stuff I've believed.  I figure everyone out there that tries and predicts things needs this.

One of the things we do here is predict the future.  Now Bonnie and I do pretty well, but we've made some real mistakes (remember when I thought the iPad was more slow burn?  Yeah, I keep reminding myself).  These mistakes would be easier to stop if there was one place to go to marinate myself in the well-meaning stupidity of the past.

Thus I want the Museum of Bad Ideas.

See, here's the thing.  I have plenty of ideas, and I know instinctively that some part of them are really awful.  I have plenty of theories of the future which I share endlessly here, and I know some will be near-mythical levels of dumb.  I'm just not sure, at the time, when I'm a genius and when I'm mistaking "enthralled with an idea" or "head up my ass" for "genius."

I figure If *I* fear that I'm being stupid, others do.  Those that don't fear being stupid, well, they're great for creating exhibits.

So, I think this museum is a great idea.

Of course my fear?  My fear is I'm wrong and this is a dumb idea.

Steven Savage