job search

Ask A Progeek: Networking When You Can’t

by

Ah, job ads.  How many times they have instructions that have our heads spinning.  Let’s take a look at our latest Ask A Progeek:

If a job posting says that “only qualified applicants will be contacted” and “no phone calls please,” it seems like they don’t want you to contact them after applying.  In that case, how do you follow up? (or should you?)

This is a case of a fundamental job search issue – two different principles colliding.  In this case the rules of “networking” and “followup” with the other rule of “don’t annoy the people who may want to hire you.”  Your job search plans grind to a halt when something like this happens, because where do you go?

Actually you don’t let the problems butt into each other head on – you go around the situation.  Just like any obstacle you find away to go around it.  You circle around the obstacle.

In this case?  The obstacle is the HR department policy.

Now this policy may make sense.  As much as it heads off your plans, they may be too busy, too concerned, too careful, or too antisocial to want you contacting them.  Ask yourself if you were recruiting or hiring, wouldn’t there be situations where you wouldn’t want anyone contacting you?  The answer, by the way, is yes.

So you can’t charge on ahead and bug HR.  So you turn around and find another way to follow up.

The big way is networking.

See you can probably find people at the company you want to work for, or find people who know people there.  These people, if you know them or can get to know them, can follow up with you personally.  It’s not going and bugging the HR department (who are probably overwhelmed), its just good networking

Now this is going to take persistence and can have you running round and round to find the right people.  But if it’s a job you really want, then it’s worth the effort to go around the barriers . . . that they kind of put in the way anyway.

A final tip – no matter how friendly they are on followup, give potential employers MANY ways to reach you – phone, email, web page, etc.  Make it easy for them to get back to you.

– Steven Savage

Steven Savage is a Geek 2.0 writer, speaker, blogger, and job coach.  He blogs on careers at http://www.fantopro.com/, nerd and geek culture at http://www.nerdcaliber.com/, and does a site of creative tools at http://www.seventhsanctum.com/. He can be reached at https://www.stevensavage.com/.

Offense, Defense, Whyfense: How We Got To The Defensive Job Search

by

Last Column I put out the theory that there’s Offensive and Defensive job searches, and we may want to focus more on “offense” and active career planning and pursuit.  This begs the question – if my theory is correct (let’s assume I am of course) then how did we end up in a state where there was so much defensive job searching – or when it became such a bad idea.

First I think that people have often played defensive with their jobs because that’s where the money is.  There’s an inherently conservative approach to where the cash-flow is.

Secondly, I think for years (but not the last 20 or so) that people often didn’t worry career-wise as much as they do now.  Paths were more defined.  Companies had promotion systems.  The economy hadn’t been ruined by morons.

Third, though I feel that people got more “careerist” 20-30 years ago, more aggressive (coinciding non-coincidentally with globalization, the tech booms, and ideas about economic ownership), this didn’t last a long time.  I think people need to be more “On Offense” in careers, but the idea we’re all Internet-dot-bomb era super-go-getters who lapsed is terribly wrong.

Fourth, then we had repeated economic meltdowns all engineered by various “go-getters” who were unethical, greedy, and ignorant.  Also, probably ugly.  Anyway, you then had people playing Defense on careers because we kept having dot-bomb meltdowns, economic collapses, and of course finally the big ol’ financial meltdown.

Of course people play Defense a lot – they always have, they didn’t have to in a lot of cases, and any era of super-careerist go-getterism was short and got wiped out by the big economy-go-booms of the last decade or so.

So now we’ve got to play more Offense and I don’t think the “cultural infrastructure” is really there for it.  But it’s time – we don’t have much choice, and I think more active engagement may let us solve the problems.

Kind of makes me wonder if we’d had more people on Career Offensive if they’d have stopped some of these problems – and how many aggressive people actually helped cause them . . .

– Steven Savage

Steven Savage is a Geek 2.0 writer, speaker, blogger, and job coach.  He blogs on careers at http://www.fantopro.com/, nerd and geek culture at http://www.nerdcaliber.com/, and does a site of creative tools at http://www.seventhsanctum.com/. He can be reached at https://www.stevensavage.com/.

Ask A Progeek: When You Have No Job

by

This week’s question is one a lot of us face:

If the interviewer asks why you don’t currently have a job, what’s the best way to answer?  (assuming there is no legitimate reason other than, no one has hired you since your last job ended)

See, first of all I’m not going to tell you to lie – and you shouldn’t, both for ethical reasons and because people will probably figure out you’re lying.  You need to tell the truth – it’s just going to depend on the size of the truth.

If the truth is simple, use it.  Don’t embellish it or go over it in detail.  You can overdo it and in a few cases dig your own grave by getting to wordy.  If a truth is simple, keep it simple, “I was laid off as the economy tanked,” “I’m on a search,” “I just left school.”

But maybe the truth needs some context.  Maybe you have to explain a layoff, or a move, or that you took a break.  Maybe you need a larger truth to put things in context – and to make sure you communicate the story, the narrative, about you and your career.  You can mention the fact you’re taking time to look at specific jobs, or you relocated for opportunities.

You have to call out the size of the truth you want to use.

However – and there’s always a however with me, isn’t there – you also need to think ahead about what you say after the truths, big or small.

See no one wants to just hear you’re unemployed.  Wether it takes a sentence or a paragraph to describe things, they want to know what you’re doing.  Don’t just say you’re unemployed and why, let them know how you’re doing nonprofit work, or studying, or something else.  Don’t let them wonder, don’t leave it to them to ask – show that in your unemployment you are staying busy.

For pro geeks like us, it should be damn easy to show how active and self-educating we are – our usual hobbies are often like min-careers.  You probably have done and are doing more than you realize even recreationally.  Anaylze those hobby/geek interests to see if you’re truly developing professionally (and if not then maybe it is time for some charity and other work)

Thus parked with the right-sized truth, you already answered the question doubtlessly in their mind, “what are they doing now?”  You answered their current question and their next one, giving you control of the narrative – all by being honest.

Stick with the truth  – in the right size, and with the right followup.

– Steven Savage

Steven Savage is a Geek 2.0 writer, speaker, blogger, and job coach.  He blogs on careers at http://www.fantopro.com/, nerd and geek culture at http://www.nerdcaliber.com/, and does a site of creative tools at http://www.seventhsanctum.com/. He can be reached at https://www.stevensavage.com/.