politics

The Question Of Authority

by

When I look at American politics, of the many crises we face, I think one of the major ones is the crisis of authority.  Namely – who should be listened to?  Who has the authority.

Despite the political dynasties we do have in our country (which doesn’t please me frankly), family lines are not well-established, authoritative ways to find leaders.  We fall back on that all too often, of course, but as royalty has taught us you don’t want to invest in genetics.

“Making Money” seems to be a popular measure of leadership, or at least “having money.”  There is at least the assumption of business sense if one has/made money.    Then again making money doesn’t mean you can actually do any other jobs, and you may just be a greedy person.

There’s the “anointed by God” idea, but we don’t seem to buy that despite the fact it gets dragged into politics.  Also since everyone is claiming God, it has a kind of dilution effect.  Also down deep, I think most people know they’re BSing about this.

“Expertise” in something should be a recognized reason for leadership, but that’s often a problem as well.  I could probably go into excessive details on that, but roughly I chalk it up to anti-intellectualism and the Dunning-Kruger effect.

Of course, we could actually look to leaders that make things work and measure it.

“When the aged wear silk and eat meat and the masses are neither cold nor hungry, it is impossible for their prince not to be a true King.” – Mencius, Confucian Philosopher

That was 2300 years ago.  Might be something to consider.

– Steven Savage

Steven Savage is a Geek 2.0 writer, speaker, blogger, and job coach.  He blogs on careers at http://www.fantopro.com/, nerd and geek culture at http://www.nerdcaliber.com/, and does a site of creative tools at http://www.seventhsanctum.com/. He can be reached at https://www.stevensavage.com/.

The Matter-Eater Lad Principle

by

I am fond of the infamously ever-continuing (and lately ever-rebooted) comic tales of the Legion of Superheroes.  Set in the 30th century, it’s about a group of young people who revive the superheroic ideal, band together disparate races and cultures, and have grand adventures.  It’s kind of it’s own genre, but is probably closest to the Japanese Anime trope of “bunch of people with abilities have adventures.”

Now it may sound weird, but this series actually had a moment that I find is a great thought provoker.  It happened when Tenzil Kem, aka Matter-Eater Lad (Yes, the names were a bit lame) was drafted to run for office on his homeworld.  Yes, imagine a political system where anyone could be in office, wether you wanted to be or not.  I suppose it was a bit like the Drazi of Babylon 5.

Now, this rather humorous incident in comics actually made me think; imagine a society where office was that random.  Imagine a society where at any moment any citizen could end up with political power.  As much as there’s humor in those statements, it’s also a thought-provoker.

See, we live in a high-tech democracy here in America.  Yes, we can certainly criticize the system, the media, the candidates, and . . . well everything . . . but people can still have a voice.  That voice may be carried by single vote or by blog or whatever, but it is a voice.  Certainly in the age of Joe The Plumber (OK he’s neither Joe nor a Plumber, stick with me), any of us could end up a political focal point.

We all have some amount of political power, and might end up with quite a bit.  We’re all a bit like Tenzil Kem, only with less of a publication history.

So are we ready?  Are we, like the inhabitants Tenzil’s homeworld of Bismoll (yes, it is a lame joke, but that’s the real name), ready to exercise our political influence?  Are we ready to have our words put into action?

Are we ready for the repercussions?

When someone makes a political statement, says what we should do, etc. I always like them to spell out their plans.  How will their idea work?  What are the repercussions? What are the side effects?  What did you base your ideas on?  Someone who can’t answer that – or who responds with snide comments and accusations – isn’t ready for political power of any kind, from a blog to a position.

We can have influence at any time.  We should be ready.

Of course judging by the sorry state of our politicians, pundits, preachers, and media people supposedly with political power are in no way ready to wield it.  Or express it.  Or in a few cases I doubt they can tie their shoes properly.

So maybe we should be holding everyone to higher standards.  Including ourselves.  In fact, starting with ourselves, since it’s too easy to just accuse others of being wrong.

Do it.  Do it for Matter-Eater Lad.

– Steven Savage

Steven Savage is a Geek 2.0 writer, speaker, blogger, and job coach.  He blogs on careers at http://www.fantopro.com/, nerd and geek culture at http://www.nerdcaliber.com/, and does a site of creative tools at http://www.seventhsanctum.com/. He can be reached at https://www.stevensavage.com/.

Politics and The Psych Degree

by

I got a degree in psychology back in college, looking for a science career, though I eventually went back to my first choice in computing.  Still, I don’t regret the degree at all (a psych degree is actually good as a minor or a complimentary degree for most anything), as it helps me get some great insights into human behavior.

One insight that comes to mind this holiday season is that Freud would have a field day with U.S. politics.

First, there’s the bizarre sexual issues, issues that indicate a kind of regressed or immature sexuality for so many people.  We’re actually to the point where rape being a bad thing is something people discuss as opposed to going “yeah, it’s bad.”  People are freaked out over contraception, something you think we’d be used to by now.

Secondly, there’s the daddy issues, and the press is really bad with this.  There’s the bizarre fawning over machismo which is often false machismo – and then just as soon as people show any machismo, there’s fear of angry daddy.  There’s an acceptance of adolescent posturing on war, and little thought on actual repercussions – I mean seriously, if there’s a war with Iran there will be impacts we have to cope with, whether a war is, was, or will be necessary.

Third, and related, there’s really little talk of long-term planning.  How do we get from A to B?  What of the repercussions?  What of sustainability?  What do we really want to do as opposed to say we’ll do.  Is this policy or that real long-term planning or a dodge?

Now I could have a Freudian field day with a lot of politics, but I suspect one of the big issues is that we don’t want to take a look at the pathological state of our own politics.  We don’t want to confront the immaturity, the parental issues, the regressed adolescent sexual issues, etc.  We know it’s there, but it seems we’re happier playing the games.

I’m not.  A lot of people aren’t.  Perhaps we need to get the media and politicians to catch on . . .

– Steven Savage

Steven Savage is a Geek 2.0 writer, speaker, blogger, and job coach.  He blogs on careers at http://www.fantopro.com/, nerd and geek culture at http://www.nerdcaliber.com/, and does a site of creative tools at http://www.seventhsanctum.com/. He can be reached at https://www.stevensavage.com/.